FForge Outcome Delivery
Outcome-as-a-Service · ENGINEERING_TOOLKIT

AeroForge — Starship Aero & Aerothermal Toolkit

Engineering-level aerodynamics & aerothermal prediction for a Starship-class vehicle, subsonic → hypersonic — validated against NACA 1135 and the U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976.

CERTIFIED Grade A Trust 93/100 Verification 100% (59 / 59) 6 disclosed seams
Read the overview Download delivery package Certification Verification

At a glance

59 / 59validation checks
3.5e-5max rel. error vs NACA 1135
0third-party dependencies

What it does

Compressible flow

Isentropic, normal/oblique shock, Prandtl-Meyer, modified-Newtonian Cp,max — validated against NACA Report 1135.

Hypersonic aero

(Modified) Newtonian CA/CN/CL/CD/Cm/L-D over a watertight panel mesh, subsonic→hypersonic database.

Aerothermal

Sutton-Graves stagnation heating mapped along a ballistic-entry trajectory through the real atmosphere.

Post-flight review

Reconcile pre-flight predictions vs flight data with RMSE/bias/R²/exceedance flags and comparison figures.

Figures

Isentropic ratios vs Mach (validated against NACA 1135)
Isentropic ratios vs Mach (validated against NACA 1135)
Normal-shock property jumps vs upstream Mach
Normal-shock property jumps vs upstream Mach
Zero-lift drag rise across the flight envelope
Zero-lift drag rise across the flight envelope
Newtonian force coefficients & L/D vs angle of attack at M=10
Newtonian force coefficients & L/D vs angle of attack at M=10
Representative reentry: Mach, dynamic pressure, heat flux vs time
Representative reentry: Mach, dynamic pressure, heat flux vs time
Pre-flight prediction vs (synthetic) post-flight data — CN(alpha)
Pre-flight prediction vs (synthetic) post-flight data — CN(alpha)

Deliverables

Overview

What it is and headline results

Outcome Contract

MUST_PASS criteria + disclosed seams

Verification Report

59/59 checks vs NACA 1135 + SA1976

Certification

Honest certification + seams

User Guide

How an aero engineer uses it

Run & Deploy

Local + Linux/Unix run

Release Notes

v1.0.0 summary

Evidence Grade

Proof Layer grade + basis

Auditor Challenge

Hostile-auditor interrogation

Limitations

All disclosed seams

Proof posture

This outcome passed a non-bypassable Proof Layer (IRS_AUDITOR). The Proof Layer assigned the certification state CERTIFIED, Evidence Grade A, and a Trust Score of 93/100 from objective evidence only. It is a lower-order engineering toolkit that brackets and feeds high-fidelity CFD (FUN3D/Loci-CHEM/DPLR); 6 seams are disclosed in the limitations.

Delivery metrics

Tokens, elapsed time, and cost for producing this outcome. Basis: Estimated — reproducible model over this outcome’s published artifacts. metrics.json

~218.9k
Tokens used
~1h 12m
Elapsed time
~$0.985
Cost (USD)

Cost and tokens are estimates derived deterministically from published artifacts and representative list pricing; actual billing may differ. Model basis: claude-sonnet-class (representative).